What is voxer on facebook

Become a Member Sign In. General Newsletters Got a news tip? Free: Join the VentureBeat Community for access to 3 premium posts and unlimited videos per month. Pretty nice, right? We know, we know! It should be on Android too. Meeting up for happy hour is so much easier now! We bet at least a few people you know are on Voxer. If not, just send them an invite link. Go to the menu and Invite Friends. Another way is via a link to your group chat. Send a message via email, SMS, and to social media.

Tap on the little arrow next to a message and go to the out arrow at the top of the screen and choose your sharing method. Oh, and you can also share your profile. Just go to the menu then My Profile. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

In this short judgment arising from a Pre-Trial Review PTR , Lord Justice Birss provided guidance on how, and at what stage of proceedings, a party should plead a case based on the doctrine of equivalents. The application arose because Voxer had served a draft amended Statement of Case on Infringement to introduce, in two respects, an infringement case based on the doctrine of equivalents, despite no mention of an equivalence case in either its Particulars of Infringement or previous Statement of Case on Infringement.

Facebook argued at the PTR that Voxer should not be allowed to run one of those points. Birss J recognised that ever since the UK Supreme Court restated the law on the doctrine of equivalents in Actavis v Lilly, it has remained an open question for practitioners as to how arguments under that doctrine should be pleaded.

Regarding the question of whether reliance on the doctrine of equivalents should be pleaded at all, Birss J's answer was a firm "yes". In his view, any party wishing to rely on the doctrine of equivalents as part of its equivalence case must say so in the Particulars of Infringement. Given a case based on the doctrine of equivalents will inevitably involve assertions of fact, including in particular the first and second Actavis questions, the application of the CPR Regarding the form of the pleading, Birss J held that that at a minimum the patentee must state that equivalence is relied on and do so by reference to the particular feature of the claim.

Whilst that may involve extra work, it would not be a serious burden for patentees. Although the Judge did not have to decide on whether all the details necessarily had to be pleaded out from the outset, he did comment obiter that in normal multi-track patent cases so excluding cases in the Shorter Trial Scheme or IPEC , an appropriate time to articulate the patentees case on the inventive concept and other aspects of the Actavis test might be when a claim chart or a Statement of Case on Infringement is produced.

The situation would be different for IPEC cases, where all the facts and arguments must be pleaded at an early stage of the proceedings pursuant to CPR The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Voxer disagrees. But late last month, Facebook added voice messaging to its standalone Messenger app. Facebook seems to be getting very serious about voice messaging and taking on your telephone.

Voxer similarly reduces your need for a home phone, or apps like Skype.